An assessment regarding the Ninth SOSP Submissions -or- How (and exactly how perhaps maybe Not) to create A systems that is good Paper
Roy Levin and David D. Redell, Ninth SOSP Program Committee Co-chairmen
On March 21, 1983, this system committee for the symposium that is 9th running System Principles, having see the eighty-three documents submitted, chosen sixteen for presentation in the symposium. This acceptance ratio of approximately one in five approximates those of past SOSPs, even though true amount of submissions ended up being notably less than in the past few years. A few people in this system committee discovered it interestingly simple to split the good documents from the bad people; certainly, the ten committee people quickly agreed upon the disposition of over 80% for the documents. Given that acceptance ratio shows, many of these had been rejections.
Following the committee had completed its selectio n process, a few people indicated dissatisfaction when you look at the quality that is overall of submissions. A number of the refused papers exhibited comparable weaknesses, weaknesses that the committee felt must have been obvious towards the writers.